Biotherapies, Cellular Therapies, and Immunotherapies
Isabella M. Holmes, DO
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
AABB Cell Therapy Standard 5.28 for incoming cell therapy products requires verification of labeling, traceability, donor eligibility, & “product attributes.” CT Standard 5.10 has additional requirements including product testing & review/retention of collection center (CC)/manufacturers Certificate of Analysis (CoA) or equivalent. Although it is standard for CC to provide the volume & total CD34 yield for peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell products (HPC-A), information for other product attributes is neither defined nor required.
Study
Design/Methods:
Batch records of all allogeneic, non-cryopreserved, HPC-A products received from external CC between 1/1/2023 & 4/30/2024 were reviewed: Marrow & HPC-A with missing CC product counts were excluded. External CC product information was examined for document type (electronic, CC-specific CoA) & product information (volume, total cell yield [total nucleated cells (TNC) or WBC; TNC/kg], cell concentration [WBC/vol], WBC differential [% MNC], platelet (PLT; per volume, total), RBC contamination [% Hct, total mL], CD34 [total CD34, CD34/kg], % viability, lymphocyte content [CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD56]. Product information was compared by document type & CC (US vs international [internl]). Statistics were performed with commercial software.
Results/Findings:
External product CC count data was available for 89/103 allogeneic HPC-A products (86%) from 10 countries & 27 CC (Table 1). Most US-CCs (34/36, 94%) uploaded product information electronically including the WBC/uL (32/34, 94%), %MNC (85%), PLT/uL (88%), %HCT (88%), total CD34 yield (97%), % viability & method (76%; 7-ADD). Two US-CC provided CC-specific CoA with product volume (2/2), TNC/kg (1), %CD34 (1), total CD34 (1), & viability (2). In contrast, CC-specific CoA were provided for all 53 products from internl-CC (P< 0.001). Most internl-CC (92%) provided cell counts as total cell count (89%), cell concentration (3.8%) or both (11%) & reported as TNC (64%), CD45+ (26%) or WBC (7.5%). CD34 yields were reported as either total CD34 (45/53, 85%), CD34/kg (81%), or %CD34 (23%) with %viability reported in only 53% products. One internl-CC provided CD34 collection efficiency. Lymphocyte content was reported as %MNC (17%), MNC/kg (2%), total CD3+ (38%), CD3/kg (34%), CD19/kg (6%), CD56/kg (4%). RBC contamination was reported in 72% as %Hct (60%) & total mL (25%). PLT content was reported in 28% as total per product (21%) or PLT/vol (7.5%).
Conclusions:
HPC-A product content provided by external CC varies significantly, particularly between internl-CC. CC-specific CoA often provided more detailed product quality data than the electronic product data preferred by US-CC.