Quality
Emmanuel Casasola (he/him/his)
Executive Director, Global Quality
BioBridge Global
San Antonio, Texas, United States
In 2023, the organization continued its utilization of a quadrant-based scorecard, now in its second year of implementation, aimed at discerning the origin of data. The X-axis delineated "People vs Process," while the Y-axis distinguished "Internal vs External". Each quadrant offered a potential score of 25 points, aggregating to a total of 100 points. Distributed monthly to operational leadership and accessible via the company intranet for all staff, the scorecard served as a focal point for monitoring performance and guiding improvement efforts. The “Quality Cup,” a competition based trophy, was given to the business unit with the highest score each month. This increased the level of engagement and desire to improve the quality metrics for each business unit.
Results/Findings:
Table 1: Quality Scorecard Metrics Over a 1 year period
Quality Scorecard | Low | High | % Improvement |
Business Unit – QualTex | 57 | 87 | 35% |
Business Unit – South Texas Blood & Tissue | 72 | 92 | 22% |
Business Unit – GenCure | 40 | 96 | 58% |
KPI – Complaints Closure Time - QualTex | | | 27% |
KPI – Complaints per month - QualTex | | | 53% |
KPI – TAT - Immunohemotology Reference Laboratory STBT | | | 45% |
KPI – SOP Periodic Review - Gencure | | |
Based on the data compiled, the Quality Scorecard was invaluable in increasing awareness of the Quality Metrics which directly impacted all business units.
Conclusions:
Having a robust Quality Scorecard that is utilized as a dashboard to measure the overall health of the Quality Management System is a great tool to drive excellence and improvement. It also serves as a great engagement tool for management to take ownership over their quality metrics and provide a unified language for a broad organization to be able to understand.